Councillor Sharon Galliford to move that:
“this Council
(i) notes that
a. the pressure on organisations to pay the right amount of tax in the right place at the right time has never been stronger;
b. polling from the Institute for Business Ethics finds that “corporate tax avoidance” has, since 2013, been the clear number one concern of the British public when it comes to business conduct;
c. almost two-thirds (63%) of the public agree that the Government and local councils should consider a company’s ethics and how they pay their tax as well as value for money and quality of service provided, when undertaking procurement;
d. around 17.5% of public contracts in the UK have been won by companies with links to tax havens;
e. it has been conservatively estimated that losses from multinational profit-shifting (just one form of tax avoidance) could be costing the UK some £7bn per annum in lost corporation tax revenues;
f. the Fair Tax Mark offers a means for business to demonstrate good tax conduct, and has been secured by a wide range of businesses across the UK, including FTSE-listed PLCs, co-operatives, social enterprises and large private businesses;
(ii) believes that
a. paying tax is often presented as a burden, but it shouldn’t be;
b. tax enables us to provide services from education, health and social care, to flood defence, roads, policing and defence. It also helps to counter financial inequalities and rebalance distorted economies;
c. as recipients of significant public funding, local authorities should take the lead in the promotion of exemplary tax conduct; be that by ensuring contractors are paying their proper share of tax, or by refusing to go along with offshore tax dodging when buying land and property;
d. where substantive stakes are held in private enterprises, then influence should be wielded to ensure that such businesses are exemplars of tax transparency and tax avoidance is shunned - e.g., no use of marketed schemes requiring disclosure under DOTAS regulations (Disclosure Of Tax Avoidance Schemes) or arrangements that might fall foul of the General Anti-Abuse Rule;
e. more action is needed, however, current law significantly restricts councils’ ability to either penalise poor tax conduct or reward good tax conduct, when buying goods or services;
f. UK cities, counties and towns can and should stand up for responsible tax conduct - doing what they can within existing frameworks and pledging to do more given the opportunity, as active supporters of international tax justice;
(iii) approves the Council’s for Fair Tax Declaration;
(iv) leads by example and demonstrates good practice in our tax conduct, right across its activities;
(v) will prompt contractors and ensure agency contractors implement IR35 robustly and pay a fair share of employment taxes;
(vi) commits to not use offshore vehicles for the purchase of land and property, especially where this leads to reduced payments of stamp duty;
(vii) undertakes due diligence to ensure that not-for-profit structures are not being used inappropriately as an artificial device to reduce the payment of tax and business rates;
(viii) demands clarity on the ultimate beneficial ownership of suppliers and their consolidated profit & loss position;
(ix) promotes Fair Tax Mark certification for any business in which we have a significant stake and where corporation tax is due;
(x) supports Fair Tax Week events in the area, and celebrates the tax contribution made by responsible businesses who say what they pay with pride; and
(xi) supports calls for urgent reform of EU and UK law to enable local authorities to better penalise poor tax conduct and reward good tax conduct through their procurement policies.”
Minutes:
It was moved by Councillor Sharon Galliford and seconded by Councillor Mark Gordon that:
“this Council
(i) notes that
a. the pressure on organisations to pay the right amount of tax in the right place at the right time has never been stronger;
b. polling from the Institute for Business Ethics finds that “corporate tax avoidance” has, since 2013, been the clear number one concern of the British public when it comes to business conduct;
c. almost two-thirds (63%) of the public agree that the Government and local councils should consider a company’s ethics and how they pay their tax as well as value for money and quality of service provided, when undertaking procurement;
d. around 17.5% of public contracts in the UK have been won by companies with links to tax havens;
e. it has been conservatively estimated that losses from multinational profit-shifting (just one form of tax avoidance) could be costing the UK some £7bn per annum in lost corporation tax revenues;
f. the Fair Tax Mark offers a means for business to demonstrate good tax conduct, and has been secured by a wide range of businesses across the UK, including FTSE-listed PLCs, co-operatives, social enterprises and large private businesses:
(ii) believes that
a. paying tax is often presented as a burden, but it shouldn’t be;
b. tax enables us to provide services from education, health and social care, to flood defence, roads, policing and defence. It also helps to counter financial inequalities and rebalance distorted economies;
c. as recipients of significant public funding, local authorities should take the lead in the promotion of exemplary tax conduct; be that by ensuring contractors are paying their proper share of tax, or by refusing to go along with offshore tax dodging when buying land and property;
d. where substantive stakes are held in private enterprises, then influence should be wielded to ensure that such businesses are exemplars of tax transparency and tax avoidance is shunned - e.g., no use of marketed schemes requiring disclosure under DOTAS regulations (Disclosure Of Tax Avoidance Schemes) or arrangements that might fall foul of the General Anti-Abuse Rule;
e. more action is needed, however, current law significantly restricts councils’ ability to either penalise poor tax conduct or reward good tax conduct, when buying goods or services;
f. UK cities, counties and towns can and should stand up for responsible tax conduct - doing what they can within existingframeworks and pledging to do more given the opportunity, as active supporters of international tax justice;
(iii) approves the Council’s for Fair Tax Declaration;
(iv) leads by example and demonstrates good practice in our tax conduct, right across its activities;
(v) will prompt contractors and ensure agency contractors implement IR35 robustly and pay a fair share of employment taxes;
(vi) commits to not use offshore vehicles for the purchase of land and property, especially where this leads to reduced payments of stamp duty;
(vii) undertakes due diligence to ensure that not-for-profit structures are not being used inappropriately as an artificial device to reduce the payment of tax and business rates;
(viii) demands clarity on the ultimate beneficial ownership of suppliers and their consolidated profit & loss position;
(ix) promotes Fair Tax Mark certification for any business in which we have a significant stake and where corporation tax is due;
(x) supports Fair Tax Week events in the area, and celebrates the tax contribution made by responsible businesses who say what they pay with pride; and
(xi) supports calls for urgent reform of EU and UK law to enable local authorities to better penalise poor tax conduct and reward good tax conduct through their procurement policies.
It was moved by Councillor Alan McClafferty and seconded by Councillor Colin Dougan that the motion be amended by removing (vi). Councillor McClafferty advised that he would not wish to prevent an opportunity to purchase a property where the only means was through an offshore vehicle that could subsequently be brought onshore. Councillor Galliford, as mover of the motion, indicted she could not accept the amendment as she felt it removed the core of the motion.The amendment was put to the vote and was carried. It therefore became the substantive motion.
RESOLVED that this Council
(i) notes that
a. the pressure on organisations to pay the right amount of tax in the right place at the right time has never been stronger;
b. polling from the Institute for Business Ethics finds that “corporate tax avoidance” has, since 2013, been the clear number one concern of the British public when it comes to business conduct;
c. almost two-thirds (63%) of the public agree that the Government and local councils should consider a company’s ethics and how they pay their tax as well as value for money and quality of service provided, when undertaking procurement;
d. around 17.5% of public contracts in the UK have been won by companies with links to tax havens;
e. it has been conservatively estimated that losses from multinational profit-shifting (just one form of tax avoidance) could be costing the UK some £7bn per annum in lost corporation tax revenues;
f. the Fair Tax Mark offers a means for business to demonstrate good tax conduct, and has been secured by a wide range of businesses across the UK, including FTSE-listed PLCs, co-operatives, social enterprises and large private businesses:
(ii) believes that
a. paying tax is often presented as a burden, but it shouldn’t be;
b. tax enables us to provide services from education, health and social care, to flood defence, roads, policing and defence. It also helps to counter financial inequalities and rebalance distorted economies;
c. as recipients of significant public funding, local authorities should take the lead in the promotion of exemplary tax conduct; be that by ensuring contractors are paying their proper share of tax, or by refusing to go along with offshore tax dodging when buying land and property;
d. where substantive stakes are held in private enterprises, then influence should be wielded to ensure that such businesses are exemplars of tax transparency and tax avoidance is shunned - e.g., no use of marketed schemes requiring disclosure under DOTAS regulations (Disclosure Of Tax Avoidance Schemes) orarrangements that might fall foul of the General Anti-Abuse Rule;
e. more action is needed, however, current law significantly restricts councils’ ability to either penalise poor tax conduct or reward good tax conduct, when buying goods or services;
f. UK cities, counties and towns can and should stand up for responsible tax conduct - doing what they can within existing frameworks and pledging to do more given the opportunity, as active supporters of international tax justice;
(iii) approves the Council’s for Fair Tax Declaration;
(iv) leads by example and demonstrates good practice in our tax conduct, right across its activities;
(v) will prompt contractors and ensure agency contractors implement IR35 robustly and pay a fair share of employment taxes;
(vi) will undertake due diligence to ensure that not-for-profit structures are not being used inappropriately as an artificial device to reduce the payment of tax and business rates;
(vii) demands clarity on the ultimate beneficial ownership of suppliers and their consolidated profit & loss position;
(viii) promotes Fair Tax Mark certification for any business in which we have a significant stake and where corporation tax is due;
(ix) supports Fair Tax Week events in the area, and celebrates the tax contribution made by responsible businesses who say what they pay with pride; and
(x) supports calls for urgent reform of EU and UK law to enable local authorities to better penalise poor tax conduct and reward good tax conduct through their procurement policies.